Thursday, April 19, 2007

Human Rights Group Sues Yahoo!

The source article can be found here.

NEW YORK (AP) -- A human-rights group sued Yahoo Wednesday on grounds the U.S. search company assisted China's communist government with torture by revealing information that led to the arrest of dissidents.

The World Organization for Human Rights USA is seeking unspecified damages and wants Yahoo to actively secure the release of any detainees.

The group said businesses that operate abroad need to be more aware of their responsibilities.

"They should not be participating actively in promoting and encouraging major human-rights abuses," said Morton Sklar, executive director for the Washington, D.C.-based organization.

Yahoo has acknowledged turning over data on its users at the request of the Chinese government, saying company employees face civil and criminal sanctions if they ignore local laws.

Without commenting directly on the federal lawsuit the human-rights group filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, Yahoo spokesman Jim Cullinan said such a matter is "better suited for diplomacy than it is in the legal forum."

He said that although company officials are "distressed that citizens in China have been imprisoned for expressing their political view on the Internet," Yahoo plans to keep offering services in China out of a belief the Internet can promote change and transform lives in that country.
Dissidents reluctant to join complaint

The lawsuit cites federal laws that govern torture and other violations of international law. Plaintiffs included jailed dissident Wang Xiaoning and his wife, Yu Ling, who was visiting San Francisco this week as part of the group's campaign.

Sklar said he knew of three other cases, but the dissidents were reluctant to join the complaint for fear of harm to their families living in China. Among those three dissidents is journalist Shi Tao, who was sentenced in 2005 to 10 years in jail.

Part of the lawsuit's goal will be to determine how widespread Yahoo's assistance was, Sklar said, "and to stop this practice of U.S. corporations being complicit."

Yahoo rivals Microsoft and Google also have been accused of helping the Chinese government crush dissent in return for access to booming Internet markets, but only Yahoo has been accused of directly assisting in a dissident's arrest.

Google has offered a censored version of its popular search engine, while Microsoft shut down, at Beijing's request, a popular Chinese blog that touches on sensitive topics such as press freedoms.

Activists, meanwhile, have criticized Cisco Systems for selling computer-networking equipment that could potentially be used to monitor Internet use.


Blogger Gary McGath said...

I just came across this blog by searching for "boycott yahoo" on Google. I hope that the lawsuit at least increases the bad publicity for Yahoo. I can't sign the boycott petition because I've been avoiding Yahoo ever since they attempted to expropriate the content created by Geocities users.

I'm bothered only by the logo that implicitly equates censorship, oppression, accommodation, and profits. Profits are in themselves good; it's the acquisition of profits by improper means (as Yahoo is doing) which is evil.

5:42 AM  
Blogger Jim said...


I can see why the logo might be interpretted that way. I agree with you--profit is morally neutral. There are a lot of good companies making a good profit without putting their customers in prison. Yahoo! isn't one of them, though. :)

8:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please see

today, from the NYT.

6:49 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home